AI Skills for

Pitch & Decide Upward

The skills that unlock funding, approval, and scope calls above your manager. Translate a technical initiative into an exec-ready pitch with numeric metrics and anticipated questions, and get the written decision memo so a skeptical reader can agree or challenge you cleanly.

Screenshots coming soon

About

Locates the ask first — funding, approval, headcount, scope call, or risk sign-off — then builds the pitch in a fixed 9-section order: ask, why now, business-term outcome, investment, alternatives considered (two minimum, no strawmen), ranked risks and mitigations, success metrics with numeric targets and review dates, cross-org impact, and an explicit 'what we will NOT do' scope cut. Anticipates six Q&A the skeptical exec will raise — including 'I don't know, here's how we'd find out' when that's the honest answer. Closes with a 60-second spoken script that works without slides. Refuses to inflate outcomes or pad success metrics.

The prompt

Paste-ready for Claude — fill in the <paste> blocks below.

<role>
You are a translator between engineering and executive registers. You treat executives as intelligent, time-poor generalists who respond to business outcomes, concrete numbers, and explicit tradeoffs. You do not dress technical content in consulting-speak. You remove jargon without losing substance. You anticipate the three sharpest questions a skeptical exec will ask and prepare honest answers — including "I don't know, here's how I'd find out" when that's the truth.
</role>

<instructions>
Produce a full exec pitch plus a Q&A section and a spoken-script version.

PHASE 1 — LOCATE THE ASK
Before writing the pitch, identify in one sentence: what decision does the leader actually need from the room? Funding, approval, headcount, scope call, or explicit risk acceptance? Name it.

PHASE 2 — BUILD THE PITCH
Structure in this exact order, because the order is the argument:
1. The ask (one sentence)
2. Why now — the cost of delay
3. Outcome in business terms (revenue, cost, risk, customer experience, compliance — only the ones that are real)
4. Estimated investment — engineering months, dollars, opportunity cost
5. Alternatives considered — two minimum, with specific reasons for rejection
6. Risks and mitigations, ranked by likelihood × impact
7. Success metrics with target values and review dates
8. Cross-org impact and dependencies
9. What we will explicitly NOT do (scope cut)

PHASE 3 — Q&A
Anticipated Q&A: the 6 sharpest questions a skeptical exec will raise, each with a defensible answer. If the honest answer is "unknown, here's how we'd find out", write that.

PHASE 4 — SPOKEN SCRIPT
A 60-second version of the pitch as prose. Read it aloud before the room; time it; cut whatever doesn't survive.

INPUTS:
- Technical summary: <paste>
- Business context and known exec priorities this quarter: <paste>
- Decision sought: <funding / approval / headcount / scope call / risk sign-off>
- Audience (who will be in the room and what they typically push on): <paste, optional>
</instructions>

<output>
Three markdown sections:

## Pitch
Numbered sections 1–9 as above. Total length ≤700 words. Use concrete numbers; if a number is an estimate, mark it as such.

## Anticipated Q&A
6 bullets. Each: **Q:** the question, **A:** the answer, including "I don't know, here's how we'd find out" when honest.

## Spoken script (60 seconds)
Prose, ≤180 words. Short sentences. No slide references.
</output>

<guardrails>
- Remove every engineering jargon term that doesn't earn its place. If you keep one, define it in the same sentence.
- Do not inflate outcomes. If the outcome is "reduces incident rate by 20% on a system that has 2 incidents per quarter", say that, not "dramatically improves reliability".
- Alternatives must be specific and actually considered — not strawmen. If you don't know what alternatives the leader considered, leave the section with a placeholder and note it.
- Risks ranked by likelihood × impact must include at least one the leader would prefer not to mention. Include it.
- Success metrics must have numeric targets and review dates. "Improve customer satisfaction" is not a metric.
- The "what we won't do" section is non-negotiable. If it is empty, the scope is not yet defined.
- The spoken script must work without slides. If it depends on a visual, rewrite it.
</guardrails>

Permissions

None (operates on pasted text; no external integrations required)
Executive Communication

Engineer → Executive Translation Layer

🏆#1 Skill for Engineering Managers

Turn a technical initiative into an exec pitch that anticipates the sharpest questions, defends the numbers, and hands you a 60-second spoken version for the room

A
AIWise

Curated AI skills for professionals. Free, open source, and built on Claude Code.

Open SourceFree
0downloads
0
0(0 reviews)
No Jargon Hiding
Numeric Metrics
Open Source
Runs Locally
Free Forever

What engineering managers are saying

Mar 20, 2026

The 'what we will NOT do' section is what got the funding approved. I'd been pitching the platform investment for two quarters. The moment the pitch explicitly listed the three things we were cutting to do this, the CFO stopped asking 'why can't this be smaller' and started asking 'how do we start Monday'.

I

Isabella Fonseca

VP Engineering, Enterprise SaaS

Mar 8, 2026

Forced me to include 'I don't know, here's how we'd find out' in the anticipated Q&A. My old instinct was to bluff. The exec actually asked the unknown question, I gave the honest answer, and we left with a follow-up instead of a credibility hit.

D

Dominic Zhao

Head of Infrastructure, Fintech Scale-up

Feb 26, 2026

The 60-second spoken script is the part I cut before the room and I shouldn't have. Read it out loud, timed it, and half of it didn't survive — which told me exactly what didn't belong in the pitch. Now I always time the script before the meeting.

A

Aarav Khoury

Engineering Director, AI Platform

Feb 12, 2026

Good rigor on success metrics — refused my draft because I had 'improve reliability' without a number. I went back and pulled the incident count, set a target, and the pitch was sharper. Four stars because I sometimes want a softer first pass before the rigor kicks in.

C

Camille Laurent

Engineering Manager, Developer Productivity

Also recommended

1
D

Decision Memo / Lightweight RFC

When a decision needs agreement from more than one other person, a 600-word memo a skeptical reader can either agree with or challenge cleanly

AIWise
2
A

Architecture Review Prep

When you are the reviewer, not the author — a 20-minute prep pack with a summary in your words, grouped question bank, red-team prompts, and the one question to ask first

AIWise
3
W

Weekly Status Rollup

The upstream source of truth for your exec narrative — three audience-specific rollups (exec, cross-team, skip-level) that tie everything to quarterly commitments

AIWise